+- CC Zone - Chip's Challenge Forum (https://forum.bitbusters.club)
+-- Forum: Chip's Challenge (https://forum.bitbusters.club/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: General Discussion (https://forum.bitbusters.club/forum-13.html)
+--- Thread: Dirty Interpretations of CC Levels (/thread-2147.html)
Dirty Interpretations of CC Levels - IceyLava108 - 17-May-2012
Quote:Oh my. We need a "dirty interpretations of CC levels" thread.
BitBuster suggested I start this thread.
Anyways, this was discovered in the CCZone level up thread when I mentioned the fact that "pink balls" and level 69 don't go together... because, you know.. ugh.
Post your findings of these in here!
Bounce City should have just been level 68. Just NO.
Dirty Interpretations of CC Levels - BitBuster - 17-May-2012
Edited to preserve the PG-13-level of this thread.
Dirty Interpretations of CC Levels - quiznos00 - 17-May-2012
You know, being the creator of CCLP3's level 69 isn't an easy task.
Dirty Interpretations of CC Levels - Lessinath - 18-May-2012
I'm not sure I like this thread. Just make sure that it stays PG-13, unlike most of the rest of the internet. lol.
Dirty Interpretations of CC Levels - Michael - 18-May-2012
Bit late for that, Lessinath
Dirty Interpretations of CC Levels - BitBuster - 18-May-2012
This probably isn't the best place to get started on a rant about the MPAA and the rating system, but I just want to say that it's absurd that you can get a PG-13 rating with extreme violence (even as far as genocide and the slaughter of children), but if you swear too much, or show too much of the human body (or discuss too many of its, ahem, functions), you end up with an R rating.
Only in America, as they say...
Dirty Interpretations of CC Levels - KeyboardWielder - 18-May-2012
Quote:I'm not sure I like this thread.
I don't like this thread either.
- Madhav.
Dirty Interpretations of CC Levels - geodave - 18-May-2012
pointless thread....ONE STAR!
(and this is nothing like the awesome Attractive People thread.)
Dirty Interpretations of CC Levels - pillowpc2001 - 18-May-2012
Quote:This probably isn't the best place to get started on a rant about the MPAA and the rating system, but I just want to say that it's absurd that you can get a PG-13 rating with extreme violence (even as far as genocide and the slaughter of children), but if you swear too much, or show too much of the human body (or discuss too many of its, ahem, functions), you end up with an R rating.
Well, IMO the difference between swearing/nudity and violence in movies is that the violence is fake, but the swearing and nudity are "real". In other words, if a child was watching the movie with their parents - if something violent is happening in the movie and the kid is asking questions and/or is scared, the parent can tell them "don't worry, it's just pretend". If they see nudity or hear questionable discussions/language, the parent can't explain this away as easily and it will probably result in a lengthier explanation that the parent would've preferred not to get into.
(I'm not saying that extremely violent movies shouldn't get R ratings - they should. I probably don't watch enough violent movies to know of any that are PG-13 that should've been R...
)
Dirty Interpretations of CC Levels - Flareon350 - 18-May-2012
If you don't like this thread then just don't look here guys. Not trying to be mean or anything but seriously it's that simple.