07-Jan-2012, 10:39 AM
I don't think this is a good idea. Which version of Spirals did you use?
If there was a CCLP2 Lynx high score table, I think we should separate the original levels that are solvable as they are from the levels that have very small fixes that make them Lynx playable and solvable, much like the normal scoreboards separately track the timed and untimed levels. Applying this to CC1, you could separately mention having solved the edited version of Thanks to... and perhaps even which version of Spirals you used.
My CC1 Lynx score is about 5,890,000 without the bonus from #145, and using the original "corrupted" version of Spirals. For CCLP2 in Lynx without any edits I have about 2,960,000 after having solved 80 levels. Maybe we could create some smart format to express information like this once there is some sort of standard way to edit some of the levels in CCLP2 for Lynx.
-Miika
If there was a CCLP2 Lynx high score table, I think we should separate the original levels that are solvable as they are from the levels that have very small fixes that make them Lynx playable and solvable, much like the normal scoreboards separately track the timed and untimed levels. Applying this to CC1, you could separately mention having solved the edited version of Thanks to... and perhaps even which version of Spirals you used.
My CC1 Lynx score is about 5,890,000 without the bonus from #145, and using the original "corrupted" version of Spirals. For CCLP2 in Lynx without any edits I have about 2,960,000 after having solved 80 levels. Maybe we could create some smart format to express information like this once there is some sort of standard way to edit some of the levels in CCLP2 for Lynx.
-Miika