Submission duration?

[KeyboardWielder]

Agreed there. Hadn't we pushed towards doing this thing, you guys would probably still be in CCLP3 mode saying "I got time, took 3 years, will take 3 years again."

Screw laziness. If you had to have ideas for CCLP1, they should already be ongoing and most possibly done with. No intervention on our hand and it'd still be the same argument listed above, while now we're pushing towards it. We told you what we want, you had time to think of it (5 months is enough to produce what you have to produce CC1-difficulty-style), we'd have to conclude at some point that either you weren't interested in contributing (which is too bad in a way), having shown absolutely no concrete proof of working in this direction, you haven't had any idea up to now (which is very unlikely) or you were too lazy to start working on it, in which case we can't wait forever.

Well, that was a somewhat-aggressively-worded reply... Or maybe it was just the unexpected way that "we" and "you guys" were used that made me feel that way.

I'm quite sure that the assumptions you're making about those who haven't contributed yet aren't correct, but I cannot prove it.

5 months isn't as long a period of time as it once used to be (and apparently, forever has become even shorter...)

There's always another CCLP.

So?



- Madhav.