21-Mar-2012, 12:39 PM
Well, the thing is, I don't know what your point is, or what arguments you'd bring to the table. That's why I asked you the question. All I know is that you disagree with CCLP3's "difficulty peak," and we both agree that YCTAOFNT is perhaps an artificially difficult puzzle.
I genuinely don't know what you mean by "abject gaming facts." Perhaps that's because I'm not a gamer. Could you please enlighten me?
Also, I have difficulty believing that there are "gaming elements that are generally accepted by any gamer." Again, it may be that this simply falls outside of my realm of experience, but I've found that it's difficult to get people to agree on facts, let alone something subjective such as "what makes a good puzzle?"
I genuinely don't know what you mean by "abject gaming facts." Perhaps that's because I'm not a gamer. Could you please enlighten me?
Also, I have difficulty believing that there are "gaming elements that are generally accepted by any gamer." Again, it may be that this simply falls outside of my realm of experience, but I've found that it's difficult to get people to agree on facts, let alone something subjective such as "what makes a good puzzle?"
Quote:In Jr. High School, I would take a gummi bear, squeeze its ears into points so it looked like Yoda, and then I would say to it "Eat you, I will!". And of course then I would it eat.