Why is there a Wikipedia page for 313 but not for 314?
#19
Quote:I think you missed my point. On the list of lists page, there should be lists. But some of those "lists" are "lists of lists" as well. So the redundancy continues....


A list of lists is also still a list. The list of lists of lists is also still a list, so any pages listing lists should also list lists of lists as well as the list of lists of lists. (But then we would have self-containing sets, causing the axioms of ZFC to crumble away and the universe to be turned into a black pit of doom and despair*...I take this post back.)

*


[Click to Show Content]
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Why is there a Wikipedia page for 313 but not for 314? - by James - 26-Mar-2012, 4:13 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 11 Guest(s)