Poll: SHOULD WE STANDARDIZE THE USAGE OF EXTENSIONS FOR USER LEVELSETS?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
YES, STANDARDIZE ALL LEVELSET EXTENSIONS TO .CCL.
17.65%
3 17.65%
YES, STANDARDIZE ALL LEVELSET EXTENSIONS TO .DAT.
11.76%
2 11.76%
NO, KEEP USING BOTH EXTENSIONS, AND MAINTAIN THE CREATOR'S ORIGINAL CHOICE.
70.59%
12 70.59%
Total 17 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

NOW CLOSED -- POLL: .dat, .ccl, or both?
#2
I'm not entirely sure if I do understand your question correctly.
I know the dat format for sets, but have no idea what ccl files are.
If it is exactly the same format and it's just about the file name, I don't understand why this matters at all - except that it might be confusing to have a ccl extension when you expect dat - everyone can choose names on their liking. But this can't be the case, as you are writing, that some programs don't work with ccl files. So I assume, it is a different format, even though it might be similar; I would think, all sets should use the same format, and it should be the dat format which is well established Slight smile

And if it is just about naming conventions to name files consistently within one storage location, just use dat as an extension.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
NOW CLOSED -- POLL: .dat, .ccl, or both? - by H2O - 26-May-2017, 4:03 PM
NOW CLOSED -- POLL: .dat, .ccl, or both? - by H2O - 26-May-2017, 4:44 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)