lookatthis scores

[lookatthis]

I doubt that, considering i didn't understand your statement about concrete evidence. Plus, from the words of J.B., what may be obvious to the designer may not be obvious to the players. Of course, he was talking about Chip's Challenge levels, but it applies here as well.

I never stated anything about concrete evidence and even though I agree with 96% of what J.B. says, the same facts will always apply. Obviously, he was talking about CC levels, but does it apply here? In a way, yes. Even though its easy to agree with him, the same would have been said for other sets.

The only reason why I don't plan to close this thread is because most people have missed the main idea of it, but possibly had no clue what they meant when they said concrete evidence. This showed me that the case started by James had no purpose. Their was never anything resolved by this. When he brought that statement up without actually taking a minute or two to look through that set in the editor, then their is nothing he could of said that would actually support that case on my quote.

If you actually want to support evidence, in a third party discussion, then here is your concrete evidence:

http://cczone.invisionzone.com/index.php?/files/file/270-60-minutes/

(I don't mean literally)