lookatthis scores

[AdrenalinDragon]

I never stated anything about concrete evidence and even though I agree with 96% of what J.B. says, the same facts will always apply. Obviously, he was talking about CC levels, but does it apply here? In a way, yes. Even though its easy to agree with him, the same would have been said for other sets.

The only reason why I don't plan to close this thread is because most people have missed the main idea of it, but possibly had no clue what they meant when they said concrete evidence. This showed me that the case started by James had no purpose. Their was never anything resolved by this. When he brought that statement up without actually taking a minute or two to look through that set in the editor, then their is nothing he could of said that would actually support that case on my quote.

I don't know how your harder levels would fair in future CCLP votings, but from what I've seen in voting, probably not too good. The downside I've noticed is after CCLP3 was released, people started to see huge flaws in those levels, despite them being very well designed, but really only for experienced players of the game or people who look at a map to work out what they are doing. We've developed a term called CCLP3-esque levels in CCLP1 voting, and I guess we all keep forgetting that newcomers play custom levels too, and they need to judge their quality too. Guesswork is usually frowned upon nowadays and having hot blocks or large amounts of randomness. I guess we've just evolved to a point where we try to make levels appropriate for everyone with MS/Lynx compatibility. Who knows though? If the next CCLP is an "anything goes" like CCLP3, you still may have a shot with getting some levels in.