bobdabaron's scores

[bobdabaron]

I got through the JoshL's and the Ultimate Chip's in Lynx, wanted to get through both in MS as well before I posted, but might as well start posting what I have now, as that will take awhile. So here's scores for completed sets:

MS Mode:

CC1 5,946,880

CC1 Blob Edition 5,892,490

CCLP1 5,945,940

CCLP2 5,999,280

CCLP3 5,977,960

CCLP4 6,084,690

JBLP1 5,963,350

JCCLP1 6,044,970

JCCLP2 6,064,110

JoshL1 (the 202 set) 10,892,930

TS0 538,790

TS1 536,440

TS2 194,290

Ultimate Chip 1 6,096,760

Ultimate Chip 2 6,083,950

Ultimate Chip 3 6,157,860

Ultimate Chip 4 6,140,070

Ultimate Chip 5 6,153,840



Lynx Mode:

CC1 5,855,560


CCLP1 5,950,290


CCLP2 5,993,040

CCLP3 5,997,040

CCLP4 6,078,640

JBLP1 5,956,630


JCCLP1 6,017,790


JCCLP2 6,047,000

JoshB_Lynx 412,960


JoshL1 (117 levels) 3,822,560


JoshL2 5,917,200

JoshL3 2,793,430

JoshL4 1,912,340

JoshL5 6,093,650

JoshL6 6,042,130

MikeL2-fix 10,701,980

The Pit of 100 Tiles 2,802,000

The Other 100 Tiles 2,862,560

Ultimate Chip 2 6,061,760

Ultimate Chip 3 6,138,030

Ultimate Chip 4 6,106,670

Ultimate Chip 5 6,120,870

~Tyler

[pillowpc2001]

That MikeL2 score puts you at 3rd place on the scoreboard. Congrats! Let me know if you want me to add you to the scoreboard (and what name you would like to go by), or if you want to report your scores yourself through the automatic system you can do that too.

</end shameless plug for new scoreboards >

[bobdabaron]

I... guess? I'd kinda had a plan in mind to have as much completed as possible (i.e. the joshL's and UC's in both rules) before sitting down and figuring all the score stuff out, but as long as somebody is willing to throw it up there, okay by me ^_^ name Tyler C (no relation to Tyler Sontag) Thanks! (and yay new scoreboards!)

I'll have to check when I get home, it *might* be MikeL2-fix that was played in MS rather than MikeL2, hopefully that doesn't mess with anything too untowardly.

I don't really consider myself an optimizer, just a "complete as much as possible with a reasonably efficient and not too sloppy time" person. I think any high places I get on boards for any of the above sets probably only came about because nobody else has yet bothered to optimize them, and once people decide to, I'll be left in the dust :-p

[bobdabaron]

oh jeez, it was MikeL2-fix in Lynx rules, not MS, my bad D-:

updating initial listing RIGHT now, sorry bout that!

*I guess that means technically I'm #1 on the Lynx scoreboard, if for no other reason than no one else played it in Lynx? :-p

[pillowpc2001]

Yes, that would be correct - well, I've solved all the levels in Lynx, I just didn't post them all on the scoreboard yet

Yeah in the old days I was an optimizer, but lately I seem to have lost the time and patience to do much of that. I've been trying to optimize a bit as I go through CCLP4, but I'm not banging my head against the wall if I can't get those last few seconds...

[bobdabaron]

My weird OCD thing is "must get above a round number!" so if I was a bit sloppy and wound up with a 502 I'm okay with that, but if I was nearly perfect and wound up with a 498 that's NOT GOOD ENOUGH so I have to go back and make up at least 2 seconds, just because it's below 500 not because it's below whatever the bold is :-p

[James]

Wow, that's a lot of scores. Do you want any of your individual level times on the official scoreboards? It's always nice to have times of all kinds on there, even if they're not bold. Do you want to be known as "Tyler C." on the official scoreboards as well?

[bobdabaron]

Wow, that's a lot of scores. Do you want any of your individual level times on the official scoreboards? It's always nice to have times of all kinds on there, even if they're not bold. Do you want to be known as "Tyler C." on the official scoreboards as well?

Sure? I'll have to find the time to sit down and compare with what's there, might be a bit before I can find the time ^^ Tyler C is fine.

I doubt any are the absolute bold, but I remember some of the Ultimate Chip individual times being the best (not yet) reported. The solutions definitely had room for improvement, so any serious optimizer could easily annihilate them, hopefully they might push someone to stretch even farther!

(and currently going back through the UC's and JoshL's in MS, that was the initial plan to have done before dumping the rest)

[bobdabaron]

So apparently Ultimate Chip 5 wasn't *very* optimized, the old "perfect score" was 6,149,750, I managed to squeak by 6,153,840

very few of the runs are perfectly executed, there's minor mistakes in pretty much all of them, but I guess the "pro-tier" folks never got around to perfecting the stuff so come-from-behind sneak victory, woo! (undoubtedly temporary, this will probably spur the serious optimizers to reclaim the throne)