Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
Latest Threads |
Pieguy's scores
Forum: View forum
Last Post: pieguy
24-Apr-2025, 12:15 PM
» Replies: 104
» Views: 63,264
|
chipster1059's scores
Forum: View forum
Last Post: chipster1059
22-Apr-2025, 4:55 PM
» Replies: 241
» Views: 167,549
|
Flareon2
Forum: View forum
Last Post: Flareon350
14-Apr-2025, 12:15 AM
» Replies: 6
» Views: 6,416
|
Walls of CC1 (CC1 Set)
Forum: View forum
Last Post: jblewis
30-Mar-2025, 5:41 PM
» Replies: 4
» Views: 617
|
CCLP5 in MS
Forum: View forum
Last Post: mmoraleta
09-Mar-2025, 5:06 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 339
|
Walls of CC1 MS tws
Forum: View forum
Last Post: mmoraleta
09-Mar-2025, 5:04 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 315
|
Top 10 most difficult lev...
Forum: View forum
Last Post: chipzone
07-Mar-2025, 1:05 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 409
|
CCLP5: A Review
Forum: View forum
Last Post: Bowman
23-Feb-2025, 10:14 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 300
|
Best ways to play CC1 & C...
Forum: View forum
Last Post: Stuntguy
11-Feb-2025, 8:43 PM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 792
|
Adding swimming animation...
Forum: View forum
Last Post: Stuntguy
11-Feb-2025, 10:17 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 594
|
|
|
Match Game |
Posted by: geodave - 24-Apr-2012, 11:34 AM - Forum: Games and Trivia
- Replies (27)
|
 |
Rules: One person posts a sentence with one word missing. Then others post their choice for the missing word.
Intention: To get laughs from readers.
|
|
|
Roman Numeral Challenge |
Posted by: IceyLava108 - 23-Apr-2012, 5:46 PM - Forum: Games and Trivia
- Replies (48)
|
 |
Give me any Roman Numeral less than 5,000 and I will solve it without any help.
For those who have little to no experience with Roman Numerals:
I - 1
V - 5
X - 10
L - 50
C - 100
D - 500
M - 1000
|
|
|
The "new" Gmail |
Posted by: BitBuster - 22-Apr-2012, 3:29 PM - Forum: General
- Replies (10)
|
 |
Hate it, hate it, hate it. I absolutely hate it. It makes "On The Rocks" and "Pain" seem almost palatable. Who decided that replacing text with poorly designed, ambiguous symbols was the best way to go? Do the people who designed this have designs for employment at Microsoft? Is Google trying to become even less user-friendly than MS Word? What is this garbage? And why did they force everyone to change? Would it have been that much of a burden to maintain the original "skin"? What was the purpose of this? Serious grumble.
[/rant]
|
|
|
Windows 3.1 inside DOSBox with MSCC... bringing back old times! |
Posted by: ChipHome5 - 22-Apr-2012, 3:47 AM - Forum: General Discussion
- Replies (4)
|
 |
I just finished writing an easy to follow guide on how to setup up (wihtout installing any program on your PC) a full Windows 3.1 environment inside the portable version of the program DOSBox. This will let you run MSCC (and other BOWEP/WEP games) inside the old, but still great, Windows 3.1 system.
This is not only an interesting experiment for nostalgics since the use of DOSBox emulating Windows 3.1 is also one of the best ways to run 16 bit games such as MSCC in 64 bit operative systems (I've tested it solving all the CC1 levels from 1 to 10 and the games seems to run perfectly with no lag).
More details are available inside the guide, which can be found here: http://chiphome5.webs.com/MSCC_DosBox_HowTo.pdf
Note: always verify that the commands you write into DOSBox (you'll find them in the guide) are correct, since commands like 'mount c c:' (never execute this command) can cause several damages to your PC if used without knowing what they do!
|
|
|
|