CCLP1 Deadline has been extended!

[rockdet]

DAC files work just fine.

Anyways, TWS aren't necessary.

[AdrenalinDragon]

Anyways, TWS aren't necessary.

They would prove all the levels in that set are solvable in both MS and Lynx though, right?

[tensorpudding]

Well, assuming that you test the solutions all the time, and are careful not to fall into the dumb toggle initialization bug, yes.

[rockdet]

I personally don't require them.

[jblewis]

Even if we did require them, I'd still rather have two staff members test each levelset, one for each ruleset, as is the case now. A .TWS can help a lot, but it may not be able to help playtesters find a bust of LUNiT proportions.

[IceyLava108]

*yawn* June 30 needs to come faster! D:

[jblewis]

I'm still debating about whether or not to go through with creating levels for and submitting JBLP2...I suppose if enough good ideas come of it in time, it may happen.

[geodave]

Well, if I was honest I'd say the more levels you and others submit, the less chance I have of getting mine in, which kinda sucks. But then there's the "we want this to be a great levelset" thing, so I'm conflicted.

I guess I just need to make some better levels....

[IceyLava108]

I'm finally on Spring Break until the 10th of April, so in these 10 days I guess I'll get more S1 levels done along with more CC1 levels completed.

[jblewis]

From what I've seen of the other submissions, I think the overall quality of the levels has increased even more than those submitted for CCLP3. It's going to be tough for a single designer to feature prominently.